Quotations in
black from the Evans paper [1] (also contained in [2]):. . . The Einstein field equation
Rμν − ½ R gμν = kTμν (11)
. . . can be deduced [1-10] as a special case of the Evans field equaton.
Rμν = Rμa qνb ηab (13)
Tμν = Tμa qνb ηab (14)
gμν = qμa qνb ηab
(15)
together with the reversed equations
Rμa =
Rμν qbν ηab
(13')
Gμν = Gμa qνb ηab
(13")
Gμa =
Gμν qbν ηab
(13''')
Tμa =
Tμν qbν ηab
(14')
qμa =
gμν qbν ηab
(15')
qaμ =
gμν qνb ηab
(15'')
In order to derive Eqs. (4) and (5), start from the Evans field Eq. (1) and use the following relations:
Gμa = − ¼ R qμa , (16)
Tμa = ¼ T qμa . (17)
Equations (16) and (17) are derived from the definitions [1-12] of R and T introduced originally by Einstein [12]:
R = gμν Rμν , T = gμν Tμν . (18)
Using the Einstein convention [12]
gμνgμν = 4 (19)
and the Cartan convention [11]
qμa qaμ = 1,
(20)
Unknown and wrong "convention"! Correct is
qμa qaμ = 4 ,
(20')
not due to Cartan but due to the fact that the matrices
(qμa) and (qaμ)
are mutual inverses and Equ. (20) gives the
trace of the 4×4 unit matrix.
together with the definitions (13) and (14), we obtain:
R = gμν Rμν
= qaμ qbν ηab Rμa qνb ηab
= (ηabηab)(qbν
qνb)
(qaμ Rμa) =
4 qaμ Rμa .
(21)
The correct calculation is
R = gμν Rμν =(15'')
qaμ ηab qbν
Rμν =(13')
qaμ Rμa
(21')
The next erroneous step follows immediately:
This calculation is wrong due to total ignorance of the rules of tensor calculus.
Multiply either side of Eq. (21) by qμa to obtain
Rμa = ¼ Rqμa , (22)
Gμa = Rμa − ½ R qμa = − ¼ R qμa , (23)
which is Eq. (16). Similarly, we obtain Eq. (17).
This instruction "multiply" is not feasible since the indices μ and a are not
free. The result, the eqs. (22) and (23), are obviously wrong since asserting
the proportionality
of the matrices (Rμa), (Gμa), (Tμa)
to (qμa), which is equivalent to the proportionality of the
matrices (Rμν), (Gμν), (Tμν) to
(gμν).
So there is no logical way to the aimed equations (22) and (23) which are identical with
Eq.(16).
Herewith Evans' calculation has completely broken down.
Remark
Rμa − ½ R qμa =
k Tμa | · ηabqνb
Û
Rμν − ½ R gμν =
k Tμν | · ηabqbν.
On the basis of the equations (13)-(15) the Einstein field equations (11) are trivially equivalent
to the Evans Field equations:
. . .
The starting point for this class of wave equation are the Einsteinian definitions [12]
R = Rμν gμν , (46)
T = Tμν gμν . (47)
Multiplication on both sides by gμν gives
R gμν = 4 Rμν, T gμν = 4 Tμν, (48)
i.e.,
Rμν = ¼ R gμν, Tμν = ¼ T gμν. (49)
[1] M.W. Evans, New Concepts from the Evans Unified Field Theory. Part One,
FoPL 18, p.139 ff.
http://www.aias.us/documents/uft/a12thpaper.pdf
[2] M.W. Evans, Chap.14 of GCUFT Vol.1 Aramis 2005