In the Maxwell Heaviside Theory the homogeneous equation is given by
Agreed so far.
d Ù F = 0
(1)
and the inhomogeneous equation by
d Ù F~ = μo J
(2)
in differential form notation.
These are first translated into tensor notation as follows. Eq.(1) is
∂ρ Fμν +
∂μ Fνρ +
∂ν Fρμ = 0 .
(3)
and this is the same as
∂μ F~ μν = 0
(4)
where the tilde denotes Hodge dual
F~ μν =
½ Îμνρσ
Fρσ .
(5)
Q. E. D.
These considerations are incorrect for several reasons.
The correct version of equ.(3) is
∂[ρ Fμν] +
C[μρσ Fν]σ = 0
where the additional term
C[μρσ Fν]σ
is caused by the anholonomicity of the coframe θσ (α=0,1,2,3)
[1, p.146 eq.(B.4.31)]. The anholonomicity is required for the orthonormality [2, p.88, eq.(3.114)] of the
frame
g(eα,eβ) = ηαβ
which cannot be attained for holonomic coframes
θα = dxα.
In other words: Evans' eq. (3) is valid only in the special case of orthonormal
Cartesian coordinates xα (α=0,1,2,3).
This can be affirmed by reading
Evans' papernote
#100(4)
, eq. (4), where he explicitly assures
that he is dealing with the Minkowskian case
gμν = gμν = diag[1, −1, −1, −1]
merely, i.e. with flat spacetime.
In curved spacetime, however, the
Î-tensor is variable [2, p.52, eq.(2.43)]. Hence
the Leibniz rule would yield additional terms in the eqs. (7-10).
In addition, the factors ½ in the eqs.(7-9) are wrong which is,
of course, of minor importance.
Analogous objections hold for the eqs. (11-12).
The validity of the subsequent eqs. (13-16) was therefore shown only for
the Minkowskian case where the equations are well-known.
[1] F.W. Hehl and Y.N. Obukhov, Foundations of Classical Electrodynamics,
Birkhäuser 2003
[2] S.M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity,
(27.12.2007)
Remarks on Evans' Web Note #103
(19.12.2007)
Myron now completely confused
(14.12.2007)
Evans' Central Claim in his Paper #100
(10.12.2007)
How Dr. Evans refutes the whole EH Theory
Therefore eq.(4),
∂μ F~ μν = 0 ,
is wrong in general space-time.
References
http://xxx.lanl.gov/PS_cache/gr-qc/pdf/9712/9712019v1.pdf, 1997.
Links
HOME