There is some little progress but a fatal error left in
http://www.atomicprecision.com/blog/2007/05/24/ece-lemma-and-dirac-wave-equation/
and its attachment
For the first time the former "Cartan Convention" is displayed correctly:
qλa
qaλ = 4
(12)
But any remark about the wrong former version qλa
qaλ = 1 (e.g. in the GCUFT book vol.1)
is missing, and no word about the designation "Cartan Convention", it's a
"normalisation" now.
However, already "Definition" (11)
R qλa =
∂μ (Γνμλqνa
−
ωaμbqλb)
(11)
is inadmissible : Equ. (11) is to be satisfied for all pairs of indices a,λ = 0,1,2,3.
Therefore Equ. (11) represents 4×4 = 16 (sixteen) definitions of R, and nobody tells us
Thus, the conclusion
why these different definitions of R should agree.
. . . and multiply both sides of eq. (11) by qaλ to obtain
R = ¼ qaλ
∂μ (Γνμλqνa
−
ωaμbqλb)
(13)
is inadmissible. This value of R cannot fulfil the 16 equations (11) in general.
Myron should check that by plugging the expression (13) into
the definitions (11) (by hand *) or by computer algebra). He should tell us the result.
Part 2 of Evans' paper is based on the existence of the (non-existing) value of R and
is obsolete therefore.
*) Applying his
New Math (handling of Eqs. (22 - 23)) Evans would probably execute the following
"self check" by hand:
There is no ECE Lemma.
Plugging R (eq.(13)) into eq.(11) yields
R qλa = [¼ qaλ ∂μ (Γνμλqνa − ωaμbqλb)] qλa
= [¼ qaλqλa] ∂μ (Γνμλqνa − ωaμbqλb)
= [¼ 4] ∂μ (Γνμλqνa − ωaμbqλb)
=
∂μ (Γνμλqνa
−
ωaμbqλb)
and so he feels fully justified.
Really! So he did!!! In the handwritten document
http://www.atomicprecision.com/blog/wp-filez/acheckpriortocoding5.pdf
we read
. . .
i.e.
o qαa = ∂μ (Γνμλqνa − ωaμbqλb) (8)
Now define
R = qaλ ∂μ (Γνμλqνa − ωaμbqλb) (9)
and use the famous EC (= Evans Convention)
qλaqaλ = 1 (!!!) (10)
to find by using the eqs. (8-10)
(25.06.2007) The consequences of the invalidity of the Evans Lemma
(19.06.2007) A Lecture on New Math given by Dr Horst Eckardt and Dr Myron W. Evans
(27.05.2007) Commentary on Evans' recent remark on the ECE Lemma
(09.04.2007) Review of the Evans Lemma
(12.03.2007) Evans "proves" the Evans Lemma again